<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Internal Linking Strategy: SEO Self Reflection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityseo.com/linking/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityseo.com/linking/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:45:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marks Diecast</title>
		<link>http://realityseo.com/linking/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Marks Diecast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityseo.com/uncategorized/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Outbound links to relevant sites:&lt;br /&gt;Instead of talking about it, I did it. 48 hours later, page 1 position 8 - from page 2 position 14.&lt;br /&gt;Seems to work for the time being. I did this on my personal site, and withhold application to a clients&#039; site until further analysis.&lt;br /&gt;Great piece of advice, if position holds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outbound links to relevant sites:<br />Instead of talking about it, I did it. 48 hours later, page 1 position 8 &#8211; from page 2 position 14.<br />Seems to work for the time being. I did this on my personal site, and withhold application to a clients&#8217; site until further analysis.<br />Great piece of advice, if position holds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cgmcgiffen</title>
		<link>http://realityseo.com/linking/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>cgmcgiffen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityseo.com/uncategorized/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Aside from the good use of well-chosen navigational aids whats the feeling about actual site structure? Should we clearly define &quot;hub&quot; and &quot;info&quot; pages on a site with our site structure and - more importantly - are they recognised by the search engines and have an effect on ranking? I have my own hunches but the data miner in me loves having some solid data first to back them up, something I&#039;ve not yet had a chance to do!&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also is it something that may have an effect on the SiteLinks Google displays - the additional pages shown in some number one rankings?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chris McGiffen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from the good use of well-chosen navigational aids whats the feeling about actual site structure? Should we clearly define &#8220;hub&#8221; and &#8220;info&#8221; pages on a site with our site structure and &#8211; more importantly &#8211; are they recognised by the search engines and have an effect on ranking? I have my own hunches but the data miner in me loves having some solid data first to back them up, something I&#8217;ve not yet had a chance to do!</p>
<p>Also is it something that may have an effect on the SiteLinks Google displays &#8211; the additional pages shown in some number one rankings?</p>
<p>Chris McGiffen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Chaffey</title>
		<link>http://realityseo.com/linking/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Chaffey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityseo.com/uncategorized/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/#comment-42</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree on that too - particularly the 4 guidelines on Problogger. If you look at the way PageRank is calculated then they should reduce the PageRank, but that formula dates back to the mid 90s and there are obviously other factors, particular hub/authority concepts at play which outweigh this. On my blog I try to include at least one topical outbound link early in the post. I would restrict myself to fewer than 10.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That&#039;s fine if you&#039;re a blogger, but if you&#039;re an enterprise site as many of my clients are, then that&#039;s not practical - although they should review opportunities for external linking and not kill it through policies. But that takes us back to internal linking strategy many opportunities for internal topical linking near start of a document are missed because content owners don&#039;t know SEO principles - this can&#039;t be left to SEOs or maybe the CMS makes this difficult.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We should stop agreeing - its not cool!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree on that too &#8211; particularly the 4 guidelines on Problogger. If you look at the way PageRank is calculated then they should reduce the PageRank, but that formula dates back to the mid 90s and there are obviously other factors, particular hub/authority concepts at play which outweigh this. On my blog I try to include at least one topical outbound link early in the post. I would restrict myself to fewer than 10.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s fine if you&#8217;re a blogger, but if you&#8217;re an enterprise site as many of my clients are, then that&#8217;s not practical &#8211; although they should review opportunities for external linking and not kill it through policies. But that takes us back to internal linking strategy many opportunities for internal topical linking near start of a document are missed because content owners don&#8217;t know SEO principles &#8211; this can&#8217;t be left to SEOs or maybe the CMS makes this difficult.</p>
<p>We should stop agreeing &#8211; its not cool!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RealitySEO</title>
		<link>http://realityseo.com/linking/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>RealitySEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityseo.com/uncategorized/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>Dave,&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At Last indeed! Why is this never discussed? When it is, there is a bit of &quot;Aw, C&#039;mon&quot; type of disagreeement from SEO&#039;s who have never given internal linking any thought. I&#039;m glad you agree it is important. I&#039;m curious how you feel about outbound links and their effect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,</p>
<p>At Last indeed! Why is this never discussed? When it is, there is a bit of &#8220;Aw, C&#8217;mon&#8221; type of disagreeement from SEO&#8217;s who have never given internal linking any thought. I&#8217;m glad you agree it is important. I&#8217;m curious how you feel about outbound links and their effect.</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Chaffey</title>
		<link>http://realityseo.com/linking/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Chaffey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityseo.com/uncategorized/internal-linking-strategy-seo-self-reflection/#comment-44</guid>
		<description>At last, another SEO who is amazed by lack of commentary and passion about internal linking strategies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I have compiled a gallery of internal linking approaches including the ones you mention such as sitemaps (in this case shown for individual products).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davechaffey.com/SEO-Best-Practice/SEO--Best-Practice-Gallery&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SEO Best Practice Gallery&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You have a great list there of internal linking approaches, but I would also include site footers, section-specific navigation and persistent search results (although Google tends to add those to the supplementals).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dave Chaffey&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.davechaffey.com/SEO-Best-Practice&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;SEO Best Practice Guide : DaveChaffey.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At last, another SEO who is amazed by lack of commentary and passion about internal linking strategies.</p>
<p>I have compiled a gallery of internal linking approaches including the ones you mention such as sitemaps (in this case shown for individual products).</p>
<p><a href="http://www.davechaffey.com/SEO-Best-Practice/SEO--Best-Practice-Gallery" rel="nofollow">SEO Best Practice Gallery</a></p>
<p>You have a great list there of internal linking approaches, but I would also include site footers, section-specific navigation and persistent search results (although Google tends to add those to the supplementals).</p>
<p>Dave Chaffey<br /><a href="http://www.davechaffey.com/SEO-Best-Practice" rel="nofollow">SEO Best Practice Guide : DaveChaffey.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
