<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reciprocal Links in a Coma &#8211; or Dead?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://realityseo.com/linking/reciprocal-links-in-a-coma-or-dead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://realityseo.com/linking/reciprocal-links-in-a-coma-or-dead/</link>
	<description>Search Engine Commentary</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 01:45:14 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donald Nelson</title>
		<link>http://realityseo.com/linking/reciprocal-links-in-a-coma-or-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 03:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityseo.com/uncategorized/reciprocal-links-in-a-coma-or-dead/#comment-48</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t say for sure how search engines evaluate reciprocal links but one thing is sure: 90% of link request that you receieve are pure junk and I think most webmasters delete them, as I do. What this means is that it is almost impossible to conduct a reciprocal linking campaign in the present climate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say for sure how search engines evaluate reciprocal links but one thing is sure: 90% of link request that you receieve are pure junk and I think most webmasters delete them, as I do. What this means is that it is almost impossible to conduct a reciprocal linking campaign in the present climate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Kohler</title>
		<link>http://realityseo.com/linking/reciprocal-links-in-a-coma-or-dead/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Oct 2006 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://realityseo.com/uncategorized/reciprocal-links-in-a-coma-or-dead/#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think the search engines will come out against reciprocal linking because a lot of reciprocal linking is prefectly acceptible and natural behavior. Offering guidance on the issue can even be tough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think the search engines will come out against reciprocal linking because a lot of reciprocal linking is prefectly acceptible and natural behavior. Offering guidance on the issue can even be tough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

